So, I rang my ever-helpful, very IT-ofay big brother. He posed a complete new set of questions, starting with this one: What do I want from my images and how can I make them work for me? Extrapolating from that we got the following:
1) Can I make money from them? Well, not really.
2) Do I want to make money from them? Well, yes, but it's not going to happen directly now is it.
3) Do I really want exposure?? ie - someone needs an image to illustrate or accompany an article, the deadline is tomorrow, and no time to discuss copyright and payment etc. Easy solution: use that image, credit the source (usually when online it's a website) and reproduce the image as it is. The source of the image gets extra exposure, potentially more traffic, leading to (potentially) more customers and more business which would lead to more revenue (hopefully).
Obviously, this is the scenario that I want to encourage. But how to do this? The time consuming way would be to edit each image, add in the website, reload all images onto various sites (Facebook, website, Flickr), and as already discussed, I have no time to be doing this! My brother told me about a website which explains in great detail the various free licences that are available online, which were created with the express purpose of protecting online work, and would probably solve my current dilemma. After explaining briefly the various options available, I came to the conclusion that the one I want will allow my images to be reproduced for either commercial or non-commercial work, as long as I am credited (that's called attribution) and they do not change it (resizing does not count as change but cropping would change the image and would not be allowed) (and that's called no-derivs) - also known as Attribution - NoDerivs (CC BY-ND). And let me tell you, it was dead easy to change on Flickr - all I had to do was go into the organise screen, select all, and then choose licence from the drop down menu, and pick the one I wanted. Quick and easy, no large lumps of time-wasting involved. I just have to work out how to apply that to my Facebook page and my website, (although that will be a lot quicker and easier than Facebook!).
Anyway, it's quite an interesting subject, but then, as my brother pointed out, these are a set of rules, written by people who play by the rules for people who also play by the rules. The only good thing is that if someone decides to break those rules, there is a structure in place to prove that there has been a breach of copyright. And I thought it would cost a lot of money to sort all this sort of thing out. Don't you just love Open Source resources! When I have more time, I want to explore the Creative Commons website in more detail, but for now, I'm quite pleased, and having navigated this little detour, shall now proceed with today's plan.
And so, dear reader, here endeth the lesson :)